An Homage to Steve Sabol and Alan Kriegsman

Steve Sabol, the President of NFL Films, passed away Tuesday. He died of cancer, and is survived by his father Ed Sabol. I was surprised when Ed, the founder of NFL Films, was inducted into the NFL Hall of Hame last year. Why was this guy — not even a broadcaster but a filmmaker — being inducted into the Football Hall of Fame? Sabol’s induction into Canton was recognition by the NFL of the importance of interpretation.

Football is still a new sport, and the fact is that playing the games didn’t build the industry, or the sport; creating a mythology around the teams, and the players, did. Sabol’s ESPN obituary actually quotes Sabol as saying that his job wasn’t only to nurture the game’s traditions, but to develop it’s mythology.

I’ve written about how the arts are part of politics, and the arts also have their own politics. Alexis Clements recently published an excellent piece in Hyperallergic noting how the non-profit industry fails at critiquing itself. Clements’s piece, titled, It is Broke, We Should Probably Fix It, critiques the non profit industry in several ways, including by noting that non-profits “are faced with a completely unsustainable and fickle funding structure that favors those who can craft the best language each year, above those who do the most work or actually succeed in serving their communities, even if on a modest scale” and earlier in that same paragraph she writes, “this leaves like-minded organizations who could form alliances or pool resources feeling an intense need to protect their turf, so to speak, by scrambling to undercut and out-metric one another .” I disagree that the corporate structure is to blame for mission creep, or mission failure, as Clements’ suggests, but I do think mission-based organization funders need to really embrace that the arts of today are grown in the soil fertilized by yesterday’s ashes. Great critics know that, and help that along. (In my mind, Lewis Segal’s Five Things I Hate About Ballet is actually a piece of arts advocacy writing.)

In an interview I did with the critic Suzanne Carbonneau several years ago she spoke about how Merce Cunningham’s dances inspired her to understand her world, and that inspiration to understanding is the critical connection between the humanities, and the arts, in entertainment. Sometimes that connection is positive, and sometimes it’s not, but the humanities side of the arts is a critical value for a functional whole community. As Walt Whitman wrote, “to have great poets there must be great audiences.”

When we talk about art critics its easy to think in terms of coverage or reporting. But when we talk about the importance of art critics we miss the real value of worthy myth-spinners, like Steve Sabol, and Alan Kriegsman. Alan Kriegsman wrote for the Washington Post and other publications at a time when the dance community in Washington, D.C. was maturing. Not only did Alan critique and support artists, he also grew participation in the dance community by helping grow its mythology.

Alan Kriegsman passed away three weeks ago, having passed the torch to a handful of worthy successors, but as the Post and similar publications keep thinning their beat, the question grows: how will we develop great audiences? How will the arts and humanities connect in this next generation?

Why Create the Bourgeon Book?

We’ve just launched a Kickstarter to support creation of a Book featuring 40 DC artists, and I want to explain why we’re doing that, and ask for your support of the project.

There a few assumptions that many arts professionals make about Modern Art:

  1. New work may not be immediately popular
  2. New work might at first seem crass/rude/in-beautiful
  3. With time, good new work will be seen as valuable

These assumptions that we may make about Modern Art are borne out by our experiences as adult cultural consumers. The marketplace frequently doesn’t immediately get it right. Sometimes really exceptional art is initially seen as stupid, a-technical, irrelevant, etc.

How does a community support new artwork? And I don’t mean financially…

Arts journalism plays a critical role. For centuries, arts journalists have helped to nurture and develop audiences. We usually think of it the other way around — that artists are nurtured by critics. And that’s true also, but really: audiences are nurtured by critics. With the financial struggles of print news outlets, the field of arts journalism has shrunk, and that has made it harder for new work to take root. With less and less coverage by professional critics, how can you help create an environment in which new art can find support?

The model that Bourgeon innovates is helping artists connect directly to readers about their own work. You’ll be able to read fourty examples in the Bourgeon Book, an anthology of contemporary art that will be published in the summer of 2012. More than just a snapshot into the lives and artwork of modern artists, the book offers insight into the role of the arts in the words of the artists themselves. You can read about how Joan Belmar‘s experience as an immigrant influences his artwork, or how Al Miner‘s introspection influences his, or how Prudence Bond‘s training influences hers. After you read these articles, I’m guessing you’ll be more inclinded to take a little bit of a longer look at what might at first seem stupid, or irrelevant.

What we’re doing with Bourgeon helps create an environment in which new artists and new artwork can thrive, and you can support that by helping us publish the Bourgeon Book. If you pledge $25 dollars or more you’ll get a free copy of the book once it’s published, and of course a larger pledge would really help. You can see more about the project and support it here:

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/bourgeon/help-create-an-arts-anthology-written-by-artists

Sincerely,

Robert Bettmann
Founding Managing Editor
Bourgeon

p.s. – Below is a list of artists whose work will be in the book with your support.

Visual Arts
Joan Belmar,
Prudence Bonds,
Judith Peck,
Megan Coyle,
Andy Shallal,
Michele Banks,
Tim Tate,
Jenny Walton,
Jessica Beels,
Salvador Casco,
Alec Simpson,
Camille Mosley-Pasley,
Al Miner,
Laurel Lukaszewski,
Patricia Spears Jones

Performing Arts
Valerie Durham,
Daniel Barbiero,
Laurel Victoria Gray,
Alvin Mayes,
Jonathan Morris,
Ken Manheimer,
Nancy Havlik,
Cem Catbas,
Jane Franklin,
Kevin Platte,
Tehreema Mitha,
Gesel Mason,
Aysha Upchurch,
Kelly Mayfield,
Dana Tai Soon Burgess,
Daniel Burkholder

Ideas
Maida Withers,
Heather Risley,
Kathryn Boland,
Jon Gann,
Heather Desaulniers,
Steven Shafarman,
Casey Maliszewski,
Jan Tievsky,
Sabado Lam
Lori Clark,
George Jackson,
Michael Bjerknes,
Cheryl Palonis Adams,
Doug Yeuell,
Judith Hanna,
Loren Ludwig

The 99% Arts

The Arts are a tool for activism in the Occupy Movement, but they are also a front on which Occupy is attacking conceits of the economic system.  The Occupy Museums working group, “calls out corruption and injustice in institutions of arts and culture,” and the attacks focus on labor issues, and service to the one percent (generally.) The Occupy Museums manifesto calls the Arts, “a corrupt hierarchical system based on false scarcity and propaganda concerning absurd elevation of one individual genius over another human being for the monetary gain of the elitest of elite.” Those inside the Arts field may find it hard to embrace these criticisms, but as the Arts wrestle with issues of diversity and aging, the Occupy attacks are an affirmation of the relevance of the Arts in civic life.

The arts are a part of Occupy in at least four ways.  The Arts are a tool in the movement, an expression of the movement, a support in the movement, and also a target.  Erin Sickler, a journalist within the movement, wrote that the Arts economy is “reproducing inequitable and oppressive economic relations,” adding that, “the moguls who 
sit on museum boards are often the 
same people who contrived the runaway financial speculation which has blighted economic life for the rest of us, in the U.S. and beyond.”  To some, the Arts are another example of an economic system that enriches and benefits the 1%, dis-empowering and disenfranchising the 99%.

Just as Occupiers lament the undue influence of one-percenters in the banking sector, they are concerned over the influence of that same group in cultural banking establishments, including museums. In one recent creative action, a group of activists circulated a very convincing parody press release imagining a world where the Whitney Museum and its Biennial dedicate themselves to the 99%. The fraudulent release includes,

As an institution dedicated to the public interest, the Whitney has an obligation to use its platform to facilitate actions that promote the good of the many over the greed and profits of the few…. As Biennial curator Elizabeth Sussman remarked, “We’re delighted we naturally got involved with Occupy Wall Street.” Documentation of the event and a full transcript of the assembly will be published online and as a supplement inserted into the Whitney Biennial 2012 exhibition catalogue, currently available in the Museum bookstore.

These activists are concerned that the producers of professional culture have been co-opted into the service of the 1%, and the Occupy Arts movement is fighting to ensure that the Arts are relevant to and reflective of the modern world. As one Occupy LA blogger wrote, “if history has taught us anything… it’s that art is among the most honest and lasting of cultural indicators.” Occupy activists believe in the Arts enough to fight for it.

Carl Jung wrote that the Arts, “dream the myth onward and give it modern dress,” and in this way, the 99% Arts movement is an expression of faith, an insistence on the importance of the Arts. As the Occupy Museums website argues, “Art and Culture are part of the commons. Art is not a luxury item.”