All Day Every Day

I love the romance of our founding fathers. “One if by land, two if by sea”. Dressing up as native Americans and dumping tea in the harbor to protest taxes. It’s very easy to get carried away with their romantic inspirations. A perfect example is the Declaration of Independence. After asserting the reasons for creating new political bonds, and establishing the method by which such assertion is made, the Declaration of Independence states:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these rights are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

It’s a good line. It’s a GREAT line. But I visited Thomas Jefferson’s pad – Monticello – some time ago, and was struck by the clever way that the slave quarters were removed from view. The main house is at the top of a hill, with a wonderful view. The slave quarters are buried in tunnels on the side of the hill. When he said – when we say – that our country is dedicated to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness – what are we talking about? Who are we talking about? (I’m now wandering into Con Law territory, but come with me.)


I’m guessing everyone reading this agrees with the Brown v. Board of Education decision that abolished the ‘separate but equal’ policy, which segregated schools based on race. Every child deserves the same opportunity to learn. At what point might it be appropriate to stop teaching a child math, and start teaching them a trade? How do we define – ‘the same opportunity to learn’? How do we decide what we can offer, and to whom?

I visited Philadelphia some time ago, and got to meet F’s grandfather, who has now passed. He was in a nursing home. F’s mother stated that putting him in the home allowed him to have “some kind of quality of life.” Which made me think that there is no expiration date on the promise to provide life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The inscription on the Liberty Bell reads,

“Proclaim LIBERTY throughout all the Land unto all the Inhabitants thereof”,

which is very romantic. And then you remember that most of the Founders had slaves.
‘The promise of America’ is something that each generation defines, all day, every day.

Part 1 of a small series on “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness”.

In Praise of … Guernica

Detail from Goshka Macuga’s tapestry version of Pablo Picasso’s Guernica, on loan to London’s Whitechapel gallery.  Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images

Below is an editorial published in The Guardian (UK) on Thursday March 26, 2009. The subtitle of the piece is ‘Flailing bulls and horses show that the visceral horrors of war are not just an affront to human civilisation, but to life.’ This is the piece in entirety:

In occupied Paris, a Gestapo officer who had barged his way into Picasso’s apartment pointed at a photo of the mural, Guernica, asking: “Did you do that?” “No,” Picasso replied, “you did”, his wit fizzing with the anger that animates the piece. Work started weeks after German bombers had unleashed an early dose of Blitzkreig on the Basque town from which the work takes its name. It was first shown at the world fair in Paris, supposedly a showcase for scientific progress, but the deaths of hundreds of civilians in a small Spanish town proved technology’s darker side. As in Picasso’s cubist days, there are symbols and broken shapes aplenty, but with Guernica there is no need to decipher. The message is stark, with immediate impact. In black and white, the piece has the urgency of a newspaper photo. Flailing bulls and horses show that the visceral horrors of war are not just an affront to human civilisation, but to life. With the help of Stepney trade unionists, keen to raise awareness of Spain’s civil war, in 1939 Guernica came to Whitechapel art gallery. Next week the gallery reopens after an overhaul, and a full-size tapestry copy will form part of an installation by artist Goshka Macuga. It is borrowed from the UN, where it normally hangs outside the security council chamber. When Colin Powell was setting out the American case for war against Iraq in 2003, it was decided it would be “appropriate” to cover it up, a tale that offers a powerful rejoinder to Wildean quips about all art being perfectly useless.

I’d like my pain up front, please

I wrote a post a little while ago about the current economic crisis. In that post I wrote:

Its amazing to me that they are saying maybe this latest stimulus wont be enough. Enough for what? Enough for whom? We live in a world that is constantly achieving new balance points….. There is very simple economic data that tells us this. The market evolves, and when the internal combustion engine develops, the people who make carriages are screwed…..Clear ideas are guideposts that can help us know how it all works. But even if we do know how it works, there is still the matter of how it is actually gonna work.”

The video below is an interview with Thomas Friedman on MSNBC. I think the only thing that Thomas can’t point out is that just as the President has to keep Republican’s voting with him, he has to keep Democrats voting with him. I do believe that there will come a time when some of the spending in the current budget will be rolled back. But if Obama didn’t do that now, Democrats would object that he was being run by the Republicans.

The economy that George Bush allowed to slide away is what Obama inherited. Oddly enough, in order to take the long-term steps to fix things, there have to be some steps ‘in the wrong direction’. Friedman is terribly smart… I enjoy listening to him keep our eyes on the ball.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy