Art, Activism, Advocacy

This is a video that I made about a year ago. I made it to accompany a dance – this video was gonna be projected. But I found that the video was much stronger than my dance, and that I was accompanying the video, not the other way around. So the video is now its own separate entity. Let me know what you think.

I’m involved with the DC Advocates for the Arts. We’re having a meeting that I think is gonna be really interesting on Wednesday December 17th from 6:30-8:00pm. A big thank you to the CUDC for hosting the meeting at the Source on 14th St.

In meetings leading up to this event, and in preparation for the series of events we’ll be running in the new year, the Steering Committee has had some interesting discussions about the difference between activism and advocacy.

We are the DC Advocates for the Arts. Our mission empowers us to increase awareness and support for local arts. As Advocates, our central program is lobbying the City Council. Local arts funding has a major impact on local arts. Not only is the money important, but in terms of germinating and supporting local art, local funding has a major impact on the focus of local art. Where local arts funding places emphasis, and priority, that portion of the arts community grows. The DC Advocates works to make sure that our local government sets appropriate priorities and funding levels.

While we are ‘advocates’, we do not consider ourselves ‘lobbyists’. Nor do we consider ourselves ‘activists’. I have been thinking about that.

We need an engaged and active arts community to make our (the DC Advocates for the Arts) voice heard. Basically, if we have no constituent support, why would the government representatives listen to us? So as an organization I feel like we need to work to encourage engagement from the arts community in local politics.

The meeting that we are having on the 17th is trying to work toward that.

According to DCist, in the next session of the City Council, there will be consideration of a Gay Marriage bill. I know a lot of us that think such a thing – especially in the face of Prop. 8 – would be a great step. In order to make our voices heard, we’re gonna need to learn how to advocate well. This meeting brings together several individuals with expertise in local politics.

Tom Birch serves as legislative counsel for the National Assembly of State Arts Agencies in Washington, D.C. His work focuses on the interests of artists and arts organizations, directing advocacy efforts, and advising state and local groups on advocacy and lobbying strategies. He served two terms in elected public office as Georgetown’s neighborhood commissioner.

Rick Rosendall was president of the Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance for three years ending in January 1999, and is now its Vice President for political affairs. He is a columnist for the Boston gay newspaper Bay Windows and Washington’s Metro Weekly. He is a native Washingtonian.

Ben Young is the Chief of Staff for D.C. Councilmember David Catania. In this role, Young regularly interacts with advocates and lobbyists wishing to advance their agenda before the Districts legislature.

This is not a meeting about Gay Marriage, or promoting Gay Rights. At this meeting we will be looking at influencing local policy, with examples from arts funding and gay rights. There was some talk amongst the steering committee of whether or not this was taking us off track. Why have a meeting that deals with any subject other than the arts?

My sense is that artists have many interests, and since the DC Advocates need an engaged arts population to do our arts advocacy, it is in our interest to encourage all forms of advocacy. It increases the pool of engaged artists who might be a part of arts advocacy. That sounds a bit mercenary, but in my role with the DC Advocates for the Arts, that’s my line….

F showed me a video the other day that’s been making the rounds:

See more videos at Funny or Die

Please let your friends know about the meeting on the 17th. I know it’s the holidays, but we need to take the momentum we have from the national election and keep working for the things that matter to us.

Wobble

This is the fifth or sixth version of Wobble. As a poem it pretty well rots. And it keeps getting shorter with each revision…  I think because I have found no real connection between the lines I like and the central feeling I am trying to express.  Along those lines: I was editing Mad Rush this morning (the piece I wrote about in the last post.)  I auditioned it for the Clarice Smith/ PG Parks Showcase last week.  Though I didn’t get in, I recommend that event.  Always a good show.  I’ll be performing Mad Rush at next week’s Dinner Party event at the Warehouse Theater.  Please come check it out, and let me know what you think.

Dancers will be able to relate to this poem: it describes my sore feet when I get up in the middle of the night. One of my favorite things about the poem was writing that I get up and wobble like a penguin. It’s an uncomfortable feeling, the foot soreness, and being a penguin all of a sudden always makes me smile.

Wobble

When I wake in the middle of the night you are with me, until I leave,

wobbling like a penguin.

At night we park. At night I dream, wake mad and drive off.

Forget me not maybe is to remember you,

forget the wobble.

Morning music and light I am grace for you.

I wobble.

Copyrighted, aight !??!

Mad Rush

I have been working on a dance to Philip Glass’s Mad Rush. The above is a video with an eight minute version of the piece.

Good choreography directs the eye on the stage. It tells you what to look at. This is a subtle art, attempted by many, and grossly abused by a similar number. If you think about it: the eye catches and follows lines of motion. So a strong motion on one side of a stage toward another draws the eye toward that energy line. If you look for it you’ll notice in good choreography how even when there are multiple things on the stage, it seems certain that most people are seeing some part of the whole that the choreographer is illuminating in that whole. 

Moments in a dance can also be highlighted. Over the time of a piece, I’ve noticed there are points where choreographers seem to accept a rhythm. Even if that rhythm is quick and energetic, this lulls (and bores) the audience. That boredom is necessary – we can’t stay on the edge of our seats forever. Good choreographers direct the eye in time and space to illuminate whatever the piece is about.

This piece – Mad Rush – is a ten minute solo. I know that’s not so long, but it’s not so short. I am working in crafting the piece with allowing the boring bits. Knowing that they set up the other parts. 
I don’t know if it’s working, or will work, but I’m enjoying that space. Not feeling like I have to make each moment of a dance be a gong show moment. (if this isn’t exciting they won’t watch the rest.) 

Performed art occurs in space and time, and I’m really enjoying getting back to the craft of that whole. For too long I was focused on the motions of a moment.